I’m doing a clear out at the moment as I’m getting the house ready to sell – I’m planning to move to West Lothian – and I came across some old notes about database normalisation. It was a summary about the first 5 normal forms so I thought I’d share them.
First Normal Form: Every column contains just one value. That means that if you have a person’s name it should be split up to forename and surname, an address is split up so that the city and postcode are in separate columns, and so on.
Second Normal Form: The First Normal Form plus every table has a primary key. That means that everything can be uniquely referenced through the primary key.
Third Normal Form: The Second Normal Form plus every non-key column depends on the primary key. So for example, if you have an Orders table then columns such as DateOfOrder and DateOfDispatch are valid but listing the client’s details such as name, address and so on are not valid.
Fourth Normal Form: Remove repeating columns to a new table. Repeating columns are indicative of a missing relationship. So, if you have an Orders table it will not have item1, item2, and item3 columns. They will be removed to a separate table and form part of a join to the orders table.
Fifth Normal Form: Remove repetition within columns. Simply, this is enumerated values. For example, a company may accept Visa, Mastercard and American Express for payment. Rather than repeat those strings in the order payment table, they can be places in a small lookup table and the order payment table can refer to their smaller primary key.
However, I should point out that my notes are at odds with other references that I found. It would seem that the correct Fifth Normal Form is to do with ternary many-to-many relationships. In fact a quick search on the internet found that what ever I had written down as the Fifth Normal Form isn’t to be found. More research is in order to find out where my idea of the Fifth Normal Form comes from
NOTE: This was rescued from the Google Cache. The original date was Saturday, 22nd April 2006.
thnks buddy! helped me in my exam today! 🙂
very uselessssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!! notes. keep it to yourself!!!
@ben Thank you for your comments, they were equally “uselessssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!”
colin!! plz could u add some examples of tables, like of all normal forms. it will surely help!!plz!!
@sachin kapoor: You might want to take a look at a post I made about Normalising the data model
seriously dis is nt worth to be praised..
@harsha Perhaps some constructive criticism would be useful if you disagree with my post. Incidentally, I did caveat the post in the final paragraph noting that it was probably incorrect in places.